Your reasons are private for a reason. It isn't my position to pry, and I won't.
litharriel, through all of this, has been the one groupie with the voice of reason- if it isn't going to work, don't invest time in it because it's A- fruitless, and B- hurtful (to both parties. Unimaginably, irreparably hurtful.)
Although, I am tempted to bristle with indignant defense on your behalf (unnecessarily, of course) to her and demand a definition of "regular guy", but I know the remark was most benignly, dulcetly made.
Re: I assume, then, that "are you okay?" would be a dumb question.
Date: 2005-10-13 12:42 am (UTC)litharriel, through all of this, has been the one groupie with the voice of reason- if it isn't going to work, don't invest time in it because it's A- fruitless, and B- hurtful (to both parties. Unimaginably, irreparably hurtful.)
Although, I am tempted to bristle with indignant defense on your behalf (unnecessarily, of course) to her and demand a definition of "regular guy", but I know the remark was most benignly, dulcetly made.
It's bedtime.