aureantes | That does sound rather Logic-Nazi......:-?

ENTJ - Commandant
You scored 81% I to E, 10% N to S, 61% F to T, and 26% J to P!

The single word to describe your type is fieldmarshal or commandant. You also belong to the larger group called rationals. You love to organize others in matters of logic. Even as a child, you likely naturally assumed the role of leader in groups. You share your personality type with 2% of the population. When you lead, you are more concerned with policy and goals than rules and regulations. You have a tendency to become a workaholic. You are impatient with repetition of error. You are friendly and outgoing, though. You don't mince words and willingly share your many strong opinions.
As a romantic partner, you are inspiring, but also somewhat challenging. You have a strong desire to be in charge and your clear need for an organized life and home can be overwelming to a partner. You like to confront conflict directly, discuss problems unflinchingly, solve them, then put them behind you. However, you can be too impatient or unwilling to take the time to listen to your partner and give them a chance to express themselves fully so that they also have a sense of closure. You are generally uncomfortable dealing with emotions, so you are apt to dismiss your partner's emotions as illogical. You feel most appreciated when your partner asks for your opinions, takes your adivce, and relies on you to get a job done right.
Your group summary: rationals (NT)
Your type summary: ENTJ

My test tracked 4 variables How you compared to other people your age and gender:

You scored higher than 99% on I to E

You scored higher than 99% on N to S

You scored higher than 99% on F to T

You scored higher than 99% on J to P

Link: The LONG Scientific Personality Test written by unpretentious2 on OkCupid, home of the The Dating Persona Test

aureantes: They misspelled "overwhelming". :P
aureantes: I don't dismiss your emotions as illogical, do I?
aureantes: *fingers ear to check for possible Spockage*
aureantes: The first time I took this test, I think I may have gotten the same results, but they called it "Executive Visionary".
jezebel_sphinx: (That's why I wound up taking it twice and even then, it didn't have me down, lol.)
aureantes: Yeah.....this result is mainly good for intimidating people.
jezebel_sphinx: lol, true enough
aureantes: LOGIC NAZI...!!!
aureantes: >:)
jezebel_sphinx: >:) :-* .... and, no, you don't dismiss my emotions. What I wound up doing was taking it once from a thinking standpoint, and one from an emotional standpoint. The truth is somewhere in the middle
jezebel_sphinx: once, rather
aureantes: I do *like* things to be organized, but it doesn't always happen that way.
jezebel_sphinx: True
aureantes: There's a difference between preference and tolerance in me....I can deal with and appreciate a lot of things, but if you're going to make me choose absolutely, sure it's gonna look like I'm more a tightass than I really am.
jezebel_sphinx: *nods* True
aureantes: Also, the whole "mercy vs. justice" thing is already phrased as a value judgement.......lol
jezebel_sphinx: lol, also true
aureantes: It'd be interesting to re-phrase that test with the opposite angle, making everything a matter of practicality....:-?

Threaded | Top-Level Comments Only

I'm ENFP myself :)

The questions are supposed to be written from multiple angles, and if you take the excruciatingly long actual Myers-Briggs, it does ask them that way. Over the years, people have studied that test, and have narrowed down the number of questions that it takes to place people on the axes. I don't know how this version was written.

I do know that it placed me far lower on the Introversion scale than I have ever been and higher on the F to T.

I like this version a bit better.

Yeah, the actual Myers-Brigg was the one that I took before, w/ pencil and paper, and I was actually quite surprised when it landed me as an extrovert, seeing as much of my life I'd been extremely selective/asocial and saw my adaptation into "functional extroversion" as something on the order of "it's a dirty job but somebody's got to do it." Which does score me extra points for empathy, though. :P

I think it was the same result as this, though, despite the fact that this one only had two way choices....basically, I tend to be pretty consciously balanced, and skew closer to the circumspect middle when I have the range of options to do so. Push comes to shove, I go a certain way....okay, so that's the whole "Executive Visionary" profile (really, "Commandant" sounds as if I were running Auschwitz or something...:-S).

Doesn't mean I don't have feelings, though...*sniff*

That does sound rather Logic-Nazi......:-?

no subject

no subject

no subject