...oh, and preferably make it something that requires more than a simple yes or no or factual-data type answer, though there's no way I can really police that anyhow. It's rather frustrating when you have tons of people out there sharing their daily cornflakes-and-milk and you aren't precisely that kind of person to go into that much mundane detail 'cause it doesn't strike you as being important (and sharing the details and intensities of your love life seems a bit irrelevant to anyone else but the parties involved). And when you don't know what everyone else is interested in hearing about in your life, and so you basically gank quizzes and shite, which is like pulling things out of a hat to react to on-camera.

Enh. It's certainly not as if I have nothing going on in my life, but it takes a certain amount of energy to filter and sort and recount it for a general audience. So, to avoid the horrorvacui of a blank topic waiting to be filled with anything atall, I'm dropping the ball in your courts, to be redropped in mine. Feel free to riff off anything I've said on here before, too.

And then I'll pose you some random queries.....fair enough, 'stead of just passing things around ad infinitum.

-

From: [identity profile] lurkitty.livejournal.com


So, if Enlightenment is the process of becoming The Infinite Deity, and if beings are no a path top acheive Enlightenment, and if all points of time were one and the same (rendering Time irrelevent), does it not generally follow that we are already Enlightened and, as such, are already God?

And who wins, you or ninjas?

From: [identity profile] aureantes.livejournal.com


Yes, we are already God (just have to realize that we have this time-transcendent enlightment, cf. "the kingdom of heaven is at hand")....and I win, because the ninjas have restricted themselves to being ninjas but I can be anything/everything at once. :P

Or something like that. Did you mean existentially or in a streetfight?


From: [identity profile] lurkitty.livejournal.com


I know, easy question. Best I could do at 0dark00...

Streetfight, of course. Yeah, my money was on you anyway!


From: [identity profile] turelie.livejournal.com


What do you think your reason for "being" is? I don't mean humanity or any group at large...I mean you, specifically. It's a question a friend of mine asked me once...and it generated a really interesting philosophical conversation.

Sorry for the lateness...I was in NH all weekend. ^_^

From: [identity profile] aureantes.livejournal.com


I think that my own reason for being, personally, is to try to bring/restore balance to the world, and to reinterpret that which has been passed down according to the biases of tradition. Once a few years back I had the words "great translator" surface in my mind, and I queried the air with affirmative response that that was indeed an epithet/function of mine.

So.....yeah, I'm here to restore balance to the Force. :P

From: [identity profile] omicronayin.livejournal.com


Hi,

I liked what you wrote in response to my post in [livejournal.com profile] aspie_trans, but when I went to respond to you found that I have been ostracized from yet another community. This throwing Galileo in prison and burning Joan of Arc at the stake for questioning the authority of The Church thing is getting a bit old, IMHO, and that is the last community I would have expected such treatment, but I've been wrong before, and suspect that not everyone there actually has Asperger's... perhaps a typical neurotypical "game" -- I don't know. It's like they think that there are endless clones of one person who is designated as having Asperger's or something I just don't seem to understand, and you'd think they never heard of an autistic rant before, which is something I seem to do in direct proportion to the amount of mistreatment and abuse I receive, which probably has nothing whatsoever to do with autism or an excruciatingly high level of sensitivity, although I could be wrong about that too.

I thought that what you wrote was quite brilliant, actually, and am trying to suppress my natural "I'm in love!" reaction. ;)

I'm honestly glad that you've somehow managed to make things work for you... I really have seen too many autistics misdiagnosed and mistreated by the system, in addition to myself.

From: [identity profile] aureantes.livejournal.com


Sorry for the late reply--I've been wading through emails lately, as I've a horrible tendency to overcommit to large projects (like trying to run a halfway-plausible Mummy RPG that needs tons of rewrites). I love roleplaying, but other people often seem to think I take it rather too seriously...:-? I'm really sorry and a bit surprised that people would ostracize you from the community, as you're one of the most interesting people I've found there--still trying to parse what internal prejudice was struck on, to get things riled up. Perhaps it's something to do with all the therapists and such on board, and what they accept or won't as being 'authentically' Aspie behaviour?

Incidentally, I'm a bit on the "falling in love" thing too when there's meeting of minds, especially over the things that it's so hard to find consensus on anyhow (seeing as I haven't an advanced college degree/doctorate/anything to 'make' people listen to all these theories of mine), and that meshing and interplay is something I can't get enough of, even though it does heighten the tension when it comes to answering my mail. I have found a mate at long last (that'd be Litharriel), but incidentally we are both open/poly-minded as well, in the 'select circle of intimates' sort of way, body and mind both. So no worries atall on that front.

Hmm....I suppose my way of making things work really hasn't been me 'managing' it so much as slipping under the diagnostical radar until I was well out of highschool/school-"systems" and well-read enough to figure things out for myself...which has been a bit trying emotionally (I understate constantly, btw), because looking back I realize that I really could have used the explanations of being transmale and being aspie (both of them) to stop people blaming me for "willfully" being asocial, antisocial, overaggressive & territorial, stubborn, ungracious, self-absorbed, over-reactive, etc. Though again, they might have just tried all the harder to condition me out of it, given the decade. So I had to deal with people assuming that I was neurologically normal-superior (academically gifted) but had a really crappy attitude around other people that needed to be fixed/guilted/etc. out of me. Serves me right for not being "disabled", I suppose....lol

I'm sure that a lot of people at aspie_trans could accuse me of not having Asperger's atall from a glance, because I'm so verbal (verbose) and don't seem to be inhibited or have trouble 'expressing my feelings' or relating to other people in a socially-normal way. I used to be a textbook introvert, and now I'm a functional extrovert, when I feel like it at least, which I think lends some credibility to the "post-traumatic wariness" idea. I'm sure that some part of me is looking for group validation ("Ooh, my own kind at last!") by sharing alot, while on the other hand I know that lack or denial of that is going to make little impression on me. Having one or two people get what I'm talking about is enough to actively hope for with that, as with many groups...quality, not quantity.

From: [identity profile] aureantes.livejournal.com


I'm rather curious, having read a bit of your journal, what exactly goes into this intensely ambivalent relationship you seem to have with the mental construct of "Woman"....surely they can't all be carbon-copies of the same exact archetype, can they?

(And if the ones you've dealt with are, then I'm sure as hell staying away from 'em too...)

So are they high-maintenance, shallow, hyper-mundane, or what? I suppose that one could say most people (of either/all genders) have skewed habits/patterns that have been imprinted on them without resistance because they're unremarkable and don't take the trouble to clarify themselves to themselves, but that part seems more in the line of "normal" (i.e., unenlightened) vs. "eccentric"(self-aware) than any sex/gender dynamic.

And it shows a great deal of ill-concealed anxiety, too, even if you like to fool around with gender signifiers yourself. There's a reaction in there, and it seems odd in a person of your intellect and fineness of logic that it should be such a memetic monolith.

From: [identity profile] omicronayin.livejournal.com


There's a reaction in there, and it seems odd in a person of your intellect and fineness of logic that it should be such a memetic monolith.

http://www.kubrick2001.com/

So are they high-maintenance, shallow, hyper-mundane, or what?

That's a big part of it. I'm sort of like a diamond that became lost in a field of coal, or a monk that got lost in the woods, searching for the forest, running around in circles.

This is something I wrote a short while ago:

I was about to step into the shower and then changed my mind, feeling that it might be a good idea to remove the nail polish from my toenails first so that I don't smell like nail polish remover, which reminded me that I may need to remind myself to make a point of reminding [livejournal.com profile] sandalfon to pick up some cottonballs as they're a lot better than tissue paper for removing nail polish. Maybe I can tie a red string around my big toe, but then I'll have to find yet another way of reminding myself what that's for and reminding myself that I put it there in the first place.

Welcome to a snapshot of the inside of my brain... is it really any wonder that I'm totally insane?

So, you take an essentially highly-gifted female brain, put it into a male body, smack it around a few times, add in a bit of testosterone, shake well, and you have me.

From: [identity profile] omicronayin.livejournal.com


In fact, I was just thinking that David Helfgott, portrayed in the movie, Shine, may very well be an example of a person with high-level autism who's brain melted down.

I act sort of like him sometimes, and based on my experience with other (mis- or un-diagnosed) autistics I've known, to me, it makes perfect sense.

From: [identity profile] aureantes.livejournal.com


Hmm...that certainly could be. I was very interested in his story and read the book after I saw the movie in the theatre (Geoffrey Rush was brilliant, I thought)...thought a lot about it for weeks after, especially about the whole "killing the goose that laid the golden egg" theme to mental/emotional sabotage. And I know that officially it's claimed that his father really wasn't abusive atall, but then, what really constitutes abuse when you've got acute nerves twanging anyhow at people's presence and meddling and control? When I was quite little I used to tell people not to breathe on my hands when they were leaning over me watching me draw--and that was a mild reprimand compared to what I often wanted to say about them hanging over me and impinging on me (useful word, impinging).

Given the high internal sensitivity and necessary routine-building of anyone studying concert piano, plus the inherent uncertainty in any performance-art (or art in general), it seems more likely that he broke under that stress compounded by interpersonal emotional pressures, making him regress into a deeper autism, rather than just having some kind of underlying schizophrenia waiting to be triggered at the drop of a (real or imagined) hat. It's always tricky to mess around with the inner workings of creative people, seeing as one can't be sure where the golden eggs are coming from.

From: [identity profile] omicronayin.livejournal.com


It's all related to the totality of his experience of life; the whole spacetime conundrum. The mind separates and divides according to what "makes sense."

From: [identity profile] omicronayin.livejournal.com


You definitely have a point.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Syd_Barrett

Excerpt:

However, as the band began to attract a large fanbase, the pressures placed on Barrett contributed to his experiencing increasing psychiatric illness.

From: [identity profile] aureantes.livejournal.com


The performing arts have always been the most reliant on superstition and propiatory rituals, to ward off the negative side of that uncertainty which is inherent in all situations where one person is trying to make an effect upon/get reaction from an audience of unknown composition and sentiment. One can't simply control all those other minds and what they feel (at least not generally), so one attempts to structure and influence the probability field around them, either with talismans/acts of perceived positive fortune, or those which are intended to deflect the envy of fate (mal occhio) by not tempting it with reference to "good luck" (or "Macbeth"--this was brilliantly played-on in an episode of The Simpsons).

From: [identity profile] omicronayin.livejournal.com


Oh wow, the way you write is getting me all turned on inside... the way your mind sparkles like a brilliant diamond of unknown composition.
.

Most Popular Tags

Powered by Dreamwidth Studios

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags