Aureantes' Lair

[These people are basically in the category of "those who speak out their arses"....well, you all know that if you've checked out anything of that somewhat-recent fracas. I had this retortical post nearly complete some time ago when my computer froze up and would not let me type (it's called a hyperactive Murphy driver...:-|). But I'd saved it embedded into another open file, and now needing to clean that one out of all unnecessaries I regurgitate this one forth, expressly for the purposes of final purgation. I do have better things to do, afterall, than waste time with such dedicated and narrowsighted sophists....]

I think that some people have their over-abstractified post-modern heads shoved up their pseudo-existential asses. One person calls me "inexperienced" and "brainwashed" (hardly!) while another tries to argue that I'm denying the existence and survival-necessity of female lying as a defense against memetic brainwashing.......instead of seeing that it's simply the prejudice of all generalized and unbalanced accusation that I'm taking aim at. They think I'm being personally defensive when all I'm defending is simple fairness and accuracy -- impersonally and without ego-investment or paranoia -- and I'm fairly certain that they're too deep into their jargon to give a rat's ass about objectivity of any kind.

Though, I am aware that being balanced the way I am, in a subculturish neck of these cyberwoods, means that I often tend to be too logical and left-brained for some people's comfort, as they are often too right-brained to maintain practical rational principles on their own behaviour and pronouncements of alleged fact. Their judgmentalism, on the other hand, apparently remains unimpaired.......and then there's that condescending assumption that I must somehow be defending illusions, even though the last time I checked, everything I was saying was attempting to loosen some rather vile and conspicuous delusional attitudes that were being vented in my vicinity and onto my friends page.

If someone writes falsely that all of a certain arbitrary group are "liars", is the person who calls her on that lie defending an illusion that people do not lie, asserting that they ought to be allowed to lie without others' taking note, or even denying that some pathological liars do exist? No. He is pointing out the logical fallacy of her statement. It does not take a genius to understand this, so so why are these pretentious and oh-so-esoteric didacticists, who are all so much more wary with their comment-fields and journal entries than I am, ignoring that simple point with every ego-defense that they can muster and calling me the defensive one?

Ah, well it could be 'cause I'm just not even pretending to be polite about it......>:) It's fun to just have at someone and rip their head off. Especially when they're not using it half as constructively as they pretend to be.

So these now are the wankers of my discontent.....because I may be an intellectual and a smartass but I ain't some paranoid self-pity-wallowing asshat crouching in my techno-fortified online bomb shelter of an LJ to guard my fragile eggshell ego from meeting any direct challenge or question while all the time shooting bitter bile at the virtual heavens, trying to strike blind sympathy from those drifting stars that never fully sleep and whose friction can always be pushed away should it start to burn too closely.